Inside Out 2, celebrated for its nuanced exploration of mental health issues, has rightly been hailed as a groundbreaking achievement in animation.
By tackling such a sensitive topic with empathy and understanding, Disney has undoubtedly made a positive impact on audiences, particularly those who have struggled with mental health challenges.
However, Disney’s decision to enforce an arbitration clause in a recent wrongful death lawsuit involving a severe allergic reaction at one of its theme parks, seems fundamentally at odds with the values espoused in its film. While the specific details of the case may be complex, the underlying principle remains: a company that has shown such sensitivity to mental health issues should be equally sensitive to the needs of those who have suffered a tragic loss.
Arbitration clauses, while often included in contracts, can be problematic, especially in cases involving serious injuries or wrongful death. These clauses can limit a consumer’s ability to access a jury trial and can potentially lead to less favourable outcomes. In the context of a wrongful death lawsuit, where the stakes are incredibly high, it seems particularly inappropriate for a company to insist on arbitration.
Right on mental health but wrong on arbitration?
Disney’s argument that the arbitration clause applies to all interactions with the company, regardless of the nature of the claim, is a stretch. While the company may have included such a clause in its terms of service, it is reasonable to question whether it should apply to a case involving such severe consequences.
The company’s insistence on enforcing the arbitration clause could be seen as a cynical attempt to protect its bottom line at the expense of justice.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataIt is a stark reminder that even the most beloved brands can prioritise profit over principle. In conclusion, Disney’s decision to enforce an arbitration clause in a wrongful death lawsuit, particularly given the company’s recent success in producing a critically acclaimed film on mental health, is a glaring contradiction. While the company may have intended to protect itself legally, its actions raise serious ethical questions about its commitment to its values and the well-being of its customers.
